Regime Change! (or not…)

There seems to be a political restlessness sweeping the globe. Uprisings in the Middle East and Northern Africa have captured headlines and left analysts scratching their heads. What’s going on?

Now yet another poorly organized opposition in an oil-rich country has risen up demanding a change of leadership, this time closer to home. Well, to be exact, it is home…Canada.

That’s right, a rag-tag coalition with a mixed agenda, led by a scrappy Liberal intellectual, Michael Ignatieff, is demanding that the Conservative government of Stephen Harper submit itself to the judgement of the Canadian people. (And by “scrappy” I mean rather plodding and pedantic–Ignatieff is the John Kerry of Canada. And by “demanding” I mean formally expressing a lack of confidence, which is enough to precipitate an election in Canada.)

The good news is that if the US decides to send in air strikes in support of the opposition at least the air crews can be back home in time for supper. Or maybe the US should just send ground troops. Check it out, you can drive to Canada from the US!

US soldiers would have to get past the Canadian border guards (who, believe me, are are a lot more scrappy than Michael Ignatieff–and by “scrappy” I mean gratuitously annoying). They wouldn’t be allowed to bring guns into Canada, of course. And only two litres of booze per person.

This will be the third time the Harper Government (as it likes to be called, rather than the “Canadian Government”) has found itself facing the judgment of the Canadian people, who have expressed their deep-seated feelings of ambivalence by turning out in underwhelming numbers to scatter their votes pretty much evenly across the political spectrum. In the past few elections less than half of Canadians have gone to the polls. Harper is Prime Minister thanks to less than 16% of the population, who voted Conservative. (No kidding!)

That is a pretty low hurdle to becoming the ruling party, but the Liberals, who ruled Canada throughout most of the 20th century, earned the votes of less than 11% of the population. What will it take to get Canadians to vote?  A recent poll asked Canadians which was a bigger problem, ignorance or apathy. The leading answer was, I don’t know and I don’t care.

As an American living in Canada I’ll admit I don’t quite know what to think about Canadian politics. That is partly because, unlike the US, there aren’t major media outlets telling me what to think. So that is something Canada could be doing better.

Another thing would be to have longer campaigns. In the US campaigns last for years. They are like a soap opera with a long story arc. Candidates are given plenty of time to say or do something which will be pounced on by their opposition. They can change their minds several times, depending on what they think will help get them elected. Voters get to to know way more about the candidates than they ever wanted to. It’s like a reality show, but less believable.

By contrast, in Canada the past few election campaigns have been close to the legal minimum of 36 days! Where is the foreplay? It’s over so soon.

Granted, campaigns cost money and Canadians consider themselves frugal. But for the cost of just one of the 65 shiny new fighter jets the (former) Harper Government wants to buy (presumably to deliver puppies to troubled parts of the world) we could have several more weeks of entertaining political drama. Plus it would give people more time to figure out how to pronounce “Ignatieff.”

But Canada is not the US. (Virtually all Canadians will agree that is a good thing. A lot of Americans will have to check a map.) A Canadian political campaign needs to be distinctly Canadian. But it needs to be exciting too, which, face it, is distinctly not Canadian.

The one exception is hockey. If politicians could harness the passion Canadians feel for hockey it would revolutionize Canadian politics. For one thing Wayne Gretzky would probably be Prime Minister. (Note to my American friends: Don’t feel bad if you have to Google him.)

Hockey is an intriguing game of beauty and violence. It is big guys on ice skates beating the crap out of each other. Except for the beauty and ice skates, that pretty much describes American politics. So it’s not like Canadian politicians don’t have a homegrown model they could follow.

Instead of “campaigns” the five political parties could have “playoffs.” Debates could take the form of a sudden death shootout. Don Cherry could become a political commentator. (Americans: Google him.) Instead of becoming Prime Minister, the leader of the winning team would be named “Most Valuable Player.”

Of course, I don’t really know if that would get Canadians interested enough to make the effort to cast their votes. But if that doesn’t work there is one thing that I am confidant would do the trick. Turn every Tim Hortons into a polling station and offer free Timbits and coffee on election day. (Americans:… never mind. You wouldn’t understand.)

Not With a Bang, But a Whimper

A couple of weeks before the end of our trip–we’re home now–my laptop died. No screeching, or scratching, or warning of any kind. It just died in its sleep. I’ll admit to being more attached to my laptop than most, so I felt like I had lost a good friend. (Is it a Mac thing?)

But in practical terms what I lost was a couple months of emails and photos, and the ability to update this blog. That is bad enough, but at least I had a backup on an external drive at home. So that is what I am running on now, until I can get a new laptop (It will be another Mac, of course.)

But that isn’t what anybody is interested in, right? What about the trip? Well, the rest of it was pretty uneventful. We spent the last two weeks back in Panajachel, on Lake Atitlan, in the same small traveler’s motel we usually stay at (in fact, in the same room we usually stay in when we’re there.) Being in familiar territory among friends and acquaintances can be nice. But we wished we had spent an extra week in San Cristóbal de las Casas, Mexico instead.

I’m going to wrap up with a report on my godchildren, for those who have been following their progress over the years.

By the time we got back from Mexico, they were all back in school and seemed excited to tell us about their classes. All four seem to embrace their studies with an enthusiasm I don’t recall experiencing. And their ambitions continue to exceed my expectations.

Angelina, Yessica and Winston

The oldest, Angelina, who is 20, is in her first year of med school, with the intent of becoming a doctor. Her sister, Yessica, 16, plans to follow in her footsteps, and is already taking pre-med courses. Winston, in between the two girls, has decided to become an orthodontist. (I took the photo to the right of the three of them 11 years ago, in their home village.)

Sarita

Sarita, who is 14, has not decided on a career path yet. From the time she was born she has had an independent spirit, so it will be interesting to see where she chooses to go. For now she is interested in music, dance and theatre.

It has been very rewarding to see what they have accomplished with just a little help. They are remarkable kids, but I suspect they are not unique. Nearly every time we are in Guatemala someone asks us to find someone to help their children with school expenses.

I’m not in the charity business, and I have mixed feelings about much of what is done down there. But I think giving a young person the opportunity to fulfill their own dreams is a good thing. If anyone is interested in getting involved, let me know.

So, that is the trip for this year. Unlike last year, I am going to try to shift gears and keep writing between now and next year’s trip (SE Asia, we think…) Stay tuned.

San Cristóbal de las Casas

After two and half weeks of indolence at the beach we were about as rested and ready to move on as we were likely to get. So we put our traveling clothes back on and got an overnight bus into Mexico’s southern mountains, to the town of San Cristóbal de las Casas,  in the state of Chiapas. Now that we’re here, we’re thinking we should have come sooner (though I can’t say I regret any of those days of swinging in a hammock, reading and listening to the ocean.)

The last time we were in San Cristóbal was nearly 14 years ago. Even then it was a charming colonial town, with a few good restaurants. The Zapatista rebellion, which grew out of the indigenous population around San Cristóbal, was in full force. I recall that we had to postpone leaving town because the Zapatistas had closed the roads. But we figured that if we were going to be trapped someplace, San Cristóbal was a pretty good place to be.

Pedestrian street.

In the years since, the rebellion has gotten quiet, though you can still buy Zapatista chic gear in the shops. And tourism has fueled an exceptional blossoming. San Cristóbal has retained its charm and, if anything, is more attractive today than it was a decade ago. A couple of streets are blocked to traffic, and are lined with coffee shops and restaurants, pubs, and shops selling art and local handicrafts. There is almost a bohemian feel. Around town are a staggering number of colonial hotels and pretty decent hostels.

There is a good nightlife, and numerous venues with live music. We splurged one night and took in a performance at one of the Argentinean restaurants. We sipped pricey drinks, listened to poetry and stories, and watched performers dance the tango. We didn’t understand much of the poetry and stories, though the Italian-flavored Argentine Spanish is beautiful. But the tango…that’s is something we will remember.

Argentineans exude attitude, or at least the ones I’ve encountered do. Most of the time I find them annoying. But the tango is all about attitude–and sure, some fancy footwork. But the tango is not a dance for someone with any self-confidance issues.  It is basically stylized strutting, and done right it is a thing of beauty. On the way back to our lodgings (which cost about the same as our drinks) Faye tried some of the sensous moves she had seen…and I had to remind her that it takes two to tango.

I think a main reason that San Cristóbal has evolved into the kind of place it is, rather than the tacky tourism-driven destination that so many other places have become, is the integrity of the local indigenous people. There are a number of Mayan villages around San Cristóbal, which are a major attraction for tourists, yet manage to maintain their traditions, for the most part.

The Zapatista rebellion was one expression of their sense of who they are as a people. But in at least one nearby village, San Juan Chamula, they’ve also managed to maintain their own religion, though blended with Catholicism which has dominated Latin America for centuries.  The identities of Catholic saints are mapped onto Mayan deities, and Jesus is worshiped as a sun god. Converts to mainstream Christianity are expelled from the village.

Though there are plenty of indigenous vendors in San Cristóbal selling their crafts and handiwork to tourists, I don’t get the sense that they have prostituted themselves. It seems more of a symbiotic relationship.

One of my favorite shops is a small store near the handicrafts market which sells machetes, hoes, woven bags and even flint-tipped bow and arrow sets, among other things–all of which are used by the local villagers. San Cristóbal is not just a tourist destination, but serves as the commercial center for the surrounding villages.

Baskets of tomatoes.

A block or two from the handicrafts market is the real market, with all the produce, meat, clothing, and just about anything else you can think of. Third-world markets are one of our favorite things. They are a feast for the senses, often mouth-watering–and sometimes eye-watering, but always fascinating.

Laid-back chickens.

The San Cristóbal market is great. Most days we end up there wandering past beautiful displays of fruits and vegetables, and oddly positioned chickens. Fortunately the hostel where we are staying has a kitchen for our use, and for a few dollars we can buy fresh produce and cook very satisfying meals (so we can go out later and buy pricey drinks.)

Speaking of drinks, in my last post I said the difference between tequila and mezcal was that they were made from different parts of the same plant. I was wrong. Or rather, I was misinformed. I should have known better than to ask the guy smoking dope in the hammock next to me.

Stencil art on street wall.

Both are made from the same part, the core or heart, of different varieties of the same plant.  Mezcal is made from the maguey, a variety of species of agave, and mostly in the state of Oaxaca. Tequila actually is mezcal, but made in a specific region–mostly around the state of Jalisco–and from only the blue agave.

As far as taste goes, probably the main difference comes from the way the two drinks are produced. For tequila the heart is steamed, and for mezcal the heart is roasted over an oak fire in a rock-lined pit, which gives it a distinct smoky flavor.

I was correct in saying that the quality of mezcal varies wildly (avoid the stuff that comes in gasoline cans or has a worm in the bottle), but some are every bit as good as fine tequilas, if not better. I’ve seen some very expensive bottles of mezcal here. In the interest of research we are sampling a mid-range bottle and are quite liking it. We hope to bring home a bottle of the good stuff (to share, of course!).

A few more days here, then back to Guatemala. This trip to Mexico has been a fun detour.